Overview
Your score is generated by AI using VC-crafted prompts. Like different partners at the same firm, each run may score differently.
Our tests found a typical 3-point swing, giving your deck a reference range of 58–64. Changes within this range may be noise. Larger changes are likely to be more meaningful.
Overall assessment
CarbonVault presents an ambitious carbon-removal vision, promising prototype metrics, and credible early institutional support. The deck does not yet show how the technology scales from a 100 kg/day p…
✓Top strengths
- A working prototype capturing 100 kg of CO2 per day and a £500K UKRI grant provide tangible early technical validation.
- The solution slide gives investors specific benchmarks on conversion, permanence, energy use, water use, and capture cost.
- The deck identifies large industrial, technology, and government buyer segments in a rapidly growing carbon-removal market.
!Critical improvements
- Show the engineering and economic path from the current prototype to a commercially relevant capture facility.
- Add a competitive landscape comparing CarbonVault with direct air capture, mineralisation, and lower-cost carbon-removal alternatives.
- State the funding ask and tie it to measurable technical, commercial, and verification milestones.
Scores
How each part of your deck scored. Select a pillar to see what drove its score.
Action plan
Start with the three priorities, in order. The quick wins are small changes you can make before your next pitch.
Priorities
The changes investors will notice most. Select a slide to preview it.
Prove the path from a 100 kg/day prototype to commercial scale
Benchmark the economics against credible carbon-removal alternatives
Connect the fundraise to the next 18 months of de-risking
Quick wins
Small changes that strengthen your deck before your next pitch.
- Put the 100 kg/day prototype and £500K UKRI grant on the opening slideHigh impact
- Add a simple process diagram showing capture, mineralisation, storage, and verificationHigh impact
- Clarify which partnerships are grants, research collaborations, pilots, or prospective customersMedium impact
- Complete the 2026 pricing target and label projections clearlyMedium impact
Investor prep
Questions your deck is likely to prompt, with why each comes up and how to answer.
“Which performance claims have been independently measured, and under what operating conditions?”
“What specifically drives the cost reduction from £180 to £95 per tonne?”
“What commercial commitment sits behind the organisations shown on the traction slide?”
Slides
8 suggestions across 7 of 8 slides.
Slide 1
low priority: Opening slide lacks proof
Fix: Add the 100 kg/day prototype and £500K UKRI grant beneath the company proposition.
Also in your action plan:
You've reached the end
Download it to keep a copy of the summary.
Not looked at yet: , , ,